Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-510 comparison
Head-to-head camera performance analysis
Olympus E-500
40
52 out of 130
Tie
Olympus E-510
40
52 out of 130
Quick Spec Comparison
| Specification | Olympus E-500 | Olympus E-510 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Size | Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) | Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) |
| ISO Range | 100 - 400 | 100 - 1600 |
| Storage Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Weather Sealing | No | No |
| Lens Mount | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-510
Sensor Size
Olympus E-500: 3/10Olympus E-510: 3/10
3
3
Four ThirdsFour Thirds
Storage Slots
Olympus E-500: 5/10Olympus E-510: 5/10
5
5
11
Resolution
Olympus E-500: 4/10Olympus E-510: 4/10
4
4
810
Max ISO Score
Olympus E-500: 1/10Olympus E-510: 1/10
1
1
ISO 400ISO 1600
Autofocus System
Olympus E-500: 2/10Olympus E-510: 2/10
2
2
3 points3 points
Video Capabilities
Olympus E-500: 2/10Olympus E-510: 2/10
2
2
NoneNone
Burst Speed
Olympus E-500: 5/10Olympus E-510: 5/10
5
5
33
Battery Life
Olympus E-500: 2/10Olympus E-510: 2/10
2
2
00
Viewfinder Quality
Olympus E-500: 5/10Olympus E-510: 5/10
5
5
no electronic viewfinderno electronic viewfinder
Portability
Olympus E-500: 10/10Olympus E-510: 10/10
10
10
479490
Lens Ecosystem
Olympus E-500: 2/10Olympus E-510: 2/10
2
2
47 lenses47 lenses
Value for Money
Olympus E-500: 10/10Olympus E-510: 10/10
10
10
$79.99$89.8
Durability
Olympus E-500: 1/10Olympus E-510: 1/10
1
1
11
Comparison Summary
Equal performance
Tied Categories
13