Fujifilm GFX 100 II vs Fujifilm X-T50 comparison
Head-to-head camera performance analysis
Fujifilm GFX 100 II
fujifilm
$7499
SLR-style mirrorless
See Fujifilm GFX 100 II full specs
Compare with Fujifilm GFX 100Compare with Fujifilm X-T50
Fujifilm GFX 100 II
69
90 out of 130
Fujifilm GFX 100 II wins
Fujifilm X-T50
64
83 out of 130
Quick Spec Comparison
| Specification | Fujifilm GFX 100 II | Fujifilm X-T50 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Size | Medium format (44 x 33 mm) | APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) |
| ISO Range | 80 - 12800 | 125 - 12800 |
| Storage Slots | 2 | 1 |
| Weather Sealing | Yes | No |
| Lens Mount | Fujifilm G | Fujifilm X |
Fujifilm GFX 100 II vs Fujifilm X-T50
Sensor Size
Fujifilm GFX 100 II: 10/10Fujifilm X-T50: 5/10
10
5
Medium formatAPS-C
Fujifilm GFX 100 II leads by 5 points
Storage Slots
Fujifilm GFX 100 II: 10/10Fujifilm X-T50: 5/10
10
5
21
Fujifilm GFX 100 II leads by 5 points
Resolution
Fujifilm GFX 100 II: 10/10Fujifilm X-T50: 9/10
10
9
10240
Fujifilm GFX 100 II leads by 1 point
Max ISO Score
Fujifilm GFX 100 II: 6/10Fujifilm X-T50: 6/10
6
6
ISO 12800ISO 12800
Autofocus System
Fujifilm GFX 100 II: 10/10Fujifilm X-T50: 10/10
10
10
425 points425 points
Video Capabilities
Fujifilm GFX 100 II: 10/10Fujifilm X-T50: 9/10
10
9
8192 x 43206240 x 4160
Fujifilm GFX 100 II leads by 1 point
Burst Speed
Fujifilm GFX 100 II: 6/10Fujifilm X-T50: 5/10
6
5
80
Fujifilm GFX 100 II leads by 1 point
Battery Life
Fujifilm GFX 100 II: 6/10Fujifilm X-T50: 3/10
6
3
540305
Fujifilm GFX 100 II leads by 3 points
Viewfinder Quality
Fujifilm GFX 100 II: 5/10Fujifilm X-T50: 5/10
5
5
9,440k dots2,360k dots
Portability
Fujifilm GFX 100 II: 8/10Fujifilm X-T50: 10/10
8
10
1030438
Fujifilm X-T50 leads by 2 points
Lens Ecosystem
Fujifilm GFX 100 II: 2/10Fujifilm X-T50: 6/10
2
6
22 lenses125 lenses
Fujifilm X-T50 leads by 4 points
Value for Money
Fujifilm GFX 100 II: 5/10Fujifilm X-T50: 9/10
5
9
$7499$1399
Fujifilm X-T50 leads by 4 points
Durability
Fujifilm GFX 100 II: 2/10Fujifilm X-T50: 1/10
2
1
21
Fujifilm GFX 100 II leads by 1 point
Comparison Summary
Equal performance
Tied Categories
3